That being said, my initial plans for research did not reflect this stance. I started by researching the history of Golden Gai in several books about Kabuki-cho and Tokyo in general. As I found out, after the occupation ended, the neighborhood was transformed into a nomiya district, filled with many tiny bars. During the 1960’s, the area become a cultural center, attracting the likes of Mishima Yukio and Ozu Yasujiro. It was much bigger in size than it is currently; a number of landowners have sold their much valued real estate over the years, and the area now consists of just several narrow alleyways that retain a vestige of post-war Tokyo. I also read several news articles on the topic of Golden Gai’s atmosphere and uncertain future. After finishing my initial research, I came up with a list of potential interviewees and questions. I decided I wanted to interview an expert who could talk about Golden Gai’s history and culture, at least one bartender, and at least one client who had been coming to Golden Gai regularly for a fairly long time. I planned to ask them mainly about the history of the neighborhood.
As stated before, Golden Gai is a steadfastly private place – the residents fear that any unwanted attention will cause an influx of curious visitors that will change the urban fabric of the neighborhood. Indeed, as I would later find out from the interviewees, Golden Gai has changed considerably in the past 5 years alone: the amount of bars has nearly doubled, and the once exclusively Japanese clientele now has given way to a large number of tourists who have discovered the area from guidebooks. The residents’ desire for privacy and the flood of tourists who do not understand the Japanese bar system have led to the aforementioned restrictions. As our interviewees speculated, the prohibitions on photography could also be attributed to the number of famous actors, musicians, filmmakers, artists, and other prominent figures who frequent the area.
Thus, gaining access to the area proved extremely difficult. I went to several bars, but my efforts were fruitless: even after I had spent an amount of money that is exorbitant for a non-drinking, broke college student such as myself, the bartenders and clientele were reluctant to give interviews. (Some offered to have un-filmed “chats” instead, while others declined to talk about Golden Gai’s history altogether.) Because of time and money constraints, I abandoned the façade of an innocent bartender and adopted a straightforward approach by stating my intentions of conducting interviews upfront. Using this approach, I found my bar of choice: Aces. Reassured by the sign on the front door (“If you have a problem, ask me! I love English and you”), I entered the bar, camera in hand, along with Shinya, the Japanese translator in the group, and two female friends studying abroad at Keio University. Much to my delight, I received a welcoming reception.
Before I continue with this particular experience, there are two unique aspects about Golden Gai that I would like to discuss. The first is that each bar tends to be specialized around a certain theme, the most famous being La Jetée, which pays homage to French avant-garde film and is known as a haunt for famous filmmakers such as Quentin Tarantino and Francis Ford Coppola. Aces was no exception to this rule: the owner, Yamashita Tsuyoshi, went to college in Colorado before returning to Japan, and the décor is reminiscent of the American southwest, with Georgia O’Keefe-esque animal skulls displayed on the walls and movies such as No Country For Old Men playing in the background.
The second point I would like to bring up is the demographics of the clientele. As stated before, a sizeable amount of tourists come to the area, and indeed, we met people from around the world at Aces. More interesting to note, however, are Golden Gai regulars, who go to the same bar almost every night, making the place their second home. This was an important factor in the methodology of the project, as I will explain later.
To summarize the first night of filming: because it was still “early” by Golden Gai standards (read: a little after 8), there were only 2 clients at the bar, both regulars. My Keio friends talked to the other bargoers while I broke the ice with Yamashita-san. Talking about the nature of my project and the difficulties I had encountered in its undertaking, I received a sympathetic response. I then started asking Yamashita-san about his experiences in America, and this led to a conversation about various personal matters. In talking to him, I felt that I was able to establish a more comfortable relationship and gain insight into the workings of Golden Gai. When I asked about the history of Golden Gai, Yamashita-san replied that he didn’t know too much about it, but the regulars offered some input. The topic of the neighborhood’s possible destruction produced a similar response.
After an hour or so had passed, I decided to start filming, asking a series of questions that I had written beforehand. I began by asking general personal information before delving into matters of Golden Gai’s history and uniqueness. The interview, as well as the preceding conversation, was conducted in English. I did not have a tripod or microphone with me at the time, so this interview was conducted as a first run, in order to have him become more accustomed to the camera and talking about the subject matter. It also allowed me to examine which elements I needed to improve or alter.
Once my interview finished, one of the regulars, Tanaka-san, offered to do an interview as well. I had actually not intended to interview anyone else in the bar that night; my original plan was to go over to the Albatross, per Professor Herrera’s recommendation, to interview the bartender there. However, interviewing Tanaka-san changed the course of the project for the better – he proved to be a valuable source of information, and by concentrating on one single bar, I became a “regular” of sorts. Granted, I was not drinking there every night, but I did get to know the people there fairly well, and this “regular” aspect was an important part of my revised methodology, which gradually came to reflect the more intangible, experiential elements of Golden Gai rather than simply its history.
I came back the next week with a slightly revised set of questions – the changes reflected my newly adopted methodology and my interview with Donald Richie (see below). The process was much the same, as I chatted with the interviewees before I began shooting in order to produce a more relaxed atmosphere. This time, the interview with Yamashita was conducted in Japanese (he was more comfortable speaking his native tongue, and it added to the atmosphere). I tried to make the interview questions open-ended, broad, or coupled with other questions. The inquiries were as follows:
For Yamashita: How old are you and what is your name? When did you first come to Golden Gai and why did you come here? What has changed since you first came to Golden Gai? What do you like about Golden Gai and what do you think could change? What makes Golden Gai unique? Can you talk about Golden Gai's history? Why are there signs prohibiting photography and filming?
For Tanaka: How old are you and what is your name? When did you first come to Golden Gai and why did you come here? What has changed since you first came to Golden Gai? What do you like about Golden Gai and what do you think could change? What makes Golden Gai unique? Can you talk about Golden Gai's history? What do you think of tourists? Is it true that Golden Gai has been purchased, and what would happen if it were replaced by high rise buildings? How do you think Golden Gai will change in the future? What will you do if Golden Gai disappears? Do you think it should be preserved?
While the experiences leading up to the final interviews were often difficult, I was very satisfied with the material in the end – the answers were alternately personal and objective, which created absorbing oral histories of Golden Gai and its loyal followers.
The process of procuring an expert on the area was similarly difficult but rewarding. I had originally toyed with the idea of asking Donald Richie for an interview after reading his book Tokyo, but I was intimidated by the idea. In my research, I discovered the Shinjuku Historical Museum, which I thought would be a perfect resource. After talking to a museum worker, Shiguchi-san, I was under the impression that an interview was certain. When I went to the museum, however, he insisted that he was “not an expert” and referred our group to the Shinjuku Ward Office. Much to my dismay, they likewise informed us that Golden Gai was not their area of expertise, and told us to instead talk to the head of the Golden Gai Neighborhood Association, Okuyama-san. However, Shinya was not able to talk to Okuyama-san by July 2nd, and the encroaching deadline caused me to panic. In what I thought would be a fruitless move, I decided to return to my first choice: Donald Richie. Fortunately, I was able to obtain an interview with Richie between 6 and 6:30 on July 4th. Because of the one-shot nature of the interview, everything had to be done efficiently and correctly (unfortunately, it was not – I had troubles with the sound, which taught me to really make sure you know what you are doing before using equipment).
After meeting Mr. Richie at Super Deluxe in Roppongi, he informed the group that he wanted to eat dinner in Roppongi Hills. While the walk over there and the buying of food took up valuable time, I also gained an opportunity to break the ice with Mr. Richie in a similar fashion to what I had done with the previous interviewees. I first informed him about the topics about which I would be inquiring (e.g., Golden Gai’s history, its transformation into a cultural center, how it reflects post-war Japan, and the neighborhood’s uncertain future). I also tried finding common ground by talking about film and literature, and I continued such conversations while I was setting up the equipment. Once I had finished, I told Mr. Richie I was ready to film, and I took out the questions I had planned to ask him, but much to my surprise, he did not even allow me time to ask questions. Instead, he launched into an eloquent speech about the aforementioned topics. The footage was self-contained and showcased his expertise in the area.
While the other two interviews were more relaxed oral histories, Mr. Richie’s was more factual and objective. Despite their differences, however, both provided positive points, and I think having such different styles strengthened the quality of my resulting video.



